[PIGMI] TRON the game
George
gt at crunchyfrog.com.au
Wed Dec 22 18:21:28 PST 2010
Hey Simon,
On 23/12/2010 9:46 AM, Simon Wittber wrote:
>> The film is good by virtue of the soundtrack, which wasn't even made by the movie makers themselves... ??? That's almost like saying a movie was good because the seats were comfortable ;)
> Would you enjoy a meat pie without tomato sauce? The two ingredients
> work together to make something greater than the sum of their parts.
>
> Considering a movie apart from it's soundtrack is similar to
> considering pancakes without maple syrup, or a chocolate cake, with no
> icing!
Ah, but the analogy here is really: The pie was gristle and mush, but it
was a great pie because it has nice tomato sauce on it.
Or: The cake was mouldy and rancid, but it had great icing so the cake
was excellent.
I'm reacting to the apparent rating of Tron highly based solely upon
it's visual and auditory elements. I notice nobody has said anything
about the story, or characters, or really anything else. Was there a
single character you actually cared about in the film at all? Does
anyone feel the story was well crafted or clever or interesting or well
thought out?
But still it seems Tron gets a pass, or even a distinction because it
had a "killer" soundtrack.
> A few other films that even depend on the soundtrack to carry the
> film, yet have critical acclaim:
A soundtrack alone cannot carry a film - there must be more, otherwise
you don't really have a movie at all, you have the equivalent of a
fireworks display - great sight and sound, but no other elements.
> - Close Encounters of the Third Kind
> - Requiem for a Dream
> - Titanic :-)
>
>
> The soundtrack was a perfect fit to the film, lots of crunchy, low
> fidelity filters and effects, simple synths reminiscent of cheesy
> arcade sound boards, melded perfectly with orchestral sections. While
> the soundtrack may sound repetitive on the surface (to an unaccustomed
> ear) you can dig very deep and discover a plenty of pleasing harmonics
> and subtle progressions.
We agree it was a perfect fit to the film :)
But how to dig deep and discover all that? At the time of watching the
film the music washed over me leaving no impression at all, other than
the vague knowledge it was techno music with a drum beat. After the
movie I checked out the Daft Punk site and listened more closely to a
couple of tracks to find....nothing more. Repetition of a riff does not
equal progression. Single tune melody with no harmony.
Sounds like you may be a Daft Punk fan? Would you enjoy any film as long
as it had a Daft Punk soundtrack?
> The story was simple, and a common one, but that doesn't make it a bad
> story. I went in to the cinema with no expectations, and came out with
> a positive experience.
The story wasn't simple. It was a mess that had absolutely zero internal
consistency and sense. It meandered, lost the plot (literally), fell to
pieces, bored you to tears and went nowhere, attempted nothing, failing
to be interesting, engaging, or entertaining. It raises more questions
than it could ever possibly answer, and it does not, cannot answer them
as the film-makers literally have no idea.
I went into the cinema with low expectations, and came out with much
less than that.
--
George
More information about the pigmi-pigmi.org
mailing list